Abstrak

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the two leading global university ranking systems: Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings and QS World University Rankings. Through examining their historical evolution, methodological frameworks, indicator weightings, and impact on institutional strategies, this research reveals significant differences in how these systems measure and evaluate higher education quality. THE’s balanced approach across teaching, research environment, research quality, international outlook, and industry engagement contrasts with QS’s emphasis on academic and employer reputation. The research includes a specific focus on how methodological differences affect strategic planning at developing institutions like New Uzbekistan University (NUU). Employing both quantitative analysis of ranking indicators and qualitative assessment of strategic implications, this study offers a theoretical framework for understanding rankings’ influence on institutional behavior and provides practical recommendations for university leaders seeking to engage effectively with ranking systems while maintaining focus on substantive educational excellence.

Kata Kunci
university rankings higher education strategic management ranking methodologies Times Higher Education QS institutional development international competitiveness developing universities
Pratinjau Dokumen
Pratinjau Tidak Diizinkan

Penyedia jurnal tidak mengijinkan pratinjau langsung.

Buka PDF Artikel