Publication Details
Abstract
This study delves into Charles Dickens's use of storytelling techniques to criticize (what may be called) Victorian industrial modernity in Hard Times. Here, rather than being a thematic reflection, the novel's social critique is argued to be an intrinsic part of its narrative design. In my study, I focus on how technical concerns serve as tools for structuring class exploitation, emotional suppression, and utilitarian teaching via the use of irony, spatial themes, and the narrator's interference. Coketown serves as a metaphor for the psychological fallout and contradictions of fact-based education, while Louisa and Sissy represent the ideological rigidity and mechanical repetition that it represents. In depicting Stephen Blackpool, further systemic unfairness in capitalist work relations is shown. This research uses a qualitative textual analysis to demonstrate how Dickens uses narrative voice and organizational structure as tools for moral posture, drawing on contemporary interdisciplinary studies. This research shows that discussions about institutional control and industrial rationality are still relevant to Hard Times today.