Publication Details
Abstract
The monumental growth of the English language has made it a complicated international phenomenon, and it has given rise to a fierce academic controversy over whether it should be used as a pragmatic lingua franca or as a means of linguistic imperialism. This paper will discuss the historical and sociolinguistic forces that have contributed to the globalization of English and its immense influence on the cultural and national identity in a globalized world. Although there is a lot of literature on the dominance of English, there is a torsome conflict between the imposition of the standard English downwards by the top and the emergence of localized World Englishes upwards. Much has to be done to achieve a balance between globalized language formations and localized cultural oppositions and the reappropriation of indigenous identities in the context of neoliberalism. The research uses a comparative synthesis of the seminal works, such as linguistic imperialism theory by Phillipson and the Three-Circle Model by Kachru, and examines qualitative data of recent publications 20052025 based on the media, education, and geopolitical contexts. The study finds that even as English is a global enabler, it tends towards being a so-called neo-imperial power that is threatening linguistic diversity. Nevertheless, the outcomes also note the emergence of the so-called Global Englishes in which the local communities decolonize the language to mark ethnic and international identities, which, in effect, turns a colonial heritage into a pluralized instrument of the cultural counterattack. Such conclusions imply that the language policy should not be fixed on strict standardization but should be based on linguistic human rights, promoting educators and policy makers to ensure the linguistic hybridity to safeguard local identities with the functional benefits of a global language.