The Theoretical Characteristics of Eastern and Western Art

This article examines efforts both east and west to account for the significance of art in human life. Despite such writings by many scholars over the years on separate traditions, the shared ground between them remains only vaguely described. The study builds on thoughts articulated by Farobi, Ibn Sina, Shakespeare, Diderot, Goethe, and Brecht, filling the gap through close reading of their works as well as historical accounts. According to the analysis, the Eastern writers treat the art as the world view philosophy and as the ability which strengthens a soul, balances the internal world of the individual and contributes to the formation of the moral character of the personality. For Western thinkers, the potential of art came from its ability to challenge society, provoke critical thought and compel individuals to view their world differently. Regardless of these differences, art was not viewed as entertainment, but rather, a medium that reflects life as well as a tool that molds the view that people take of the world, and hence, how they behave both in thinking and in action. The research implies these histories still have relevance today. They help put into perspective how art continues to lead to social change, increased human knowledge, and cultural bridges between civilizations that matured thousands of miles apart.