Publication Details
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes the development of extrajudicial mechanisms for the settlement of child support (alimony) obligations in the context of modern legal systems, with particular attention to mediation and notarized agreements as alternatives to judicial proceedings.
Methods. The study employs comparative legal analysis, doctrinal research, and the examination of regulatory frameworks and enforcement practices in three countries representing different legal traditions.
Results. The analysis demonstrates that the effectiveness of out-of-court settlement of child support obligations depends on legal certainty, procedural accessibility, and the level of trust among participants. It is established that mediation and notarized agreements contribute to reducing court caseloads and ensuring faster and more sustainable fulfillment of obligations. At the same time, national legal system characteristics significantly influence the scope and practical application of these mechanisms.
Discussion. The findings confirm the advisability of expanding extrajudicial instruments for resolving child support disputes and highlight the need to improve legal regulation and institutional support in this area to enhance their effectiveness.