Analysis of Disagreements Regarding Haram and Halal in the Book “Al-Hidaya”

General Background: Islamic jurisprudence has long engaged in discussions about what is considered halal (permissible) and haram (forbidden) in various aspects of life. These classifications are essential for Muslims, guiding them in religious, social, and economic matters. Specific Background: Burhanuddin al-Marghinani’s Al-Hidaya is one of the most significant works in Hanafi jurisprudence, systematically addressing legal disagreements (hilyaf) related to halal and haram. However, differences persist among Islamic legal schools, particularly in dietary laws, financial transactions, and family law. Knowledge Gap: While extensive research exists on Al-Hidaya, few studies have focused on its role in resolving disagreements regarding halal and haram across different schools of thought. Aims: This study aims to analyze the major disagreements on halal and haram within Al-Hidaya, comparing its interpretations with other seminal Islamic legal texts, including Al-Muwatta by Imam Malik and Al-Umm by Imam Shafi'i. Results: The analysis demonstrates Al-Hidaya’s methodological approach in reconciling legal differences, promoting inclusivity, and fostering jurisprudential flexibility. Novelty: This study highlights the enduring relevance of Al-Hidaya in contemporary Islamic legal debates and its impact on shaping a tolerant and cohesive legal tradition. Implications: Understanding Al-Hidaya’s approach to legal disagreements offers insights into how classical jurisprudence can inform modern legal challenges in the Muslim world.