Publication Details
Abstract
This article examines the common and distinctive factors that shaped English and Uzbek enlightenment and reform traditions from a comparative-typological perspective. The study argues that both traditions emerged as intellectual and literary responses to social stagnation, educational crisis, moral disorder, and the need for cultural renewal. However, the historical conditions, ideological foundations, and practical aims of English and Uzbek enlightenment movements differed significantly. English enlightenment and reform thought developed in close connection with rationalism, individual liberty, empiricism, industrial transformation, parliamentary culture, and the expansion of public discourse. Uzbek enlightenment and reform traditions, especially as represented in Jadid literature, were shaped by the need for national awakening, educational modernization, moral renewal, anti-colonial consciousness, and the reform of traditional social institutions. The research applies comparative-historical, typological, cultural-contextual, and thematic methods. The analysis focuses on the conceptual categories of education, reason, morality, national consciousness, social responsibility, public communication, and literary reform. The article demonstrates that both English and Uzbek traditions regarded knowledge as a key instrument of social development. At the same time, English enlightenment emphasized the autonomous individual, civic rationality, and institutional reform, whereas Uzbek Jadid enlightenment emphasized collective awakening, national survival, school reform, linguistic renewal, and moral-pedagogical education. The study contributes to comparative literary and cultural studies by showing that enlightenment and reform should be understood not as uniform European concepts but as historically adaptable intellectual models that acquire different meanings in different cultural environments.